Not complete, but what I did today/found out at my meeting with the new LSSP and diagnostician.
LSSP - I LIKE her. She was intrigued with the use of the iPad and specific apps for  special ed students (we spent a good 15 min comparing apps on our  iphones); she had no issues at all going through the "autism supplement"  for which things we felt DD1 needs in her accomodations; likewise she  went through her BIP with me too to make it less of the piece of  confusing crap that it was and make it into something far more  constructive and intervening instead of "punishment after the fact". She  also has been doing anything and everything she can to get dd1 into the  FOCUS group even without the AU label (since it may take some time to  come to agreement on that, but dd1 needs the group NOW).
Diagnostician - had specific concerns with the BIP also and contributed a  lot of thought to that, specifically lowering the degree of mastery for  dd1 at this time (previously it was 4 out of 5 probes or 80%, we all  felt 60% would be better WITH the newly clarified stuff). Is going to  look into a diversity class or something that can be presented to dd1's  homeroom so the kids will not be as apt to tease her about her assistive  tech. She also recommended that perhaps the OT could bring some extra  bean bags that other children could compete/work something out with the  teacher to make them seem like desirable things to the other kids. Also  went through and took everything from the ARD minutes and is typing them  into the little "accomodations" boxes to make sure her teachers have  that information at hand.
Now, I hope I don't get her in trouble, and I expressed my fear of that -  but I signed consent for them to contact the family counselor we used  through the Spec Ed center last year. I related how shocked she had been  that dd1 was there as an ED student and not AU, and that she might have  personal observations or notes that could shed more light on things.  Also, that she had coached us through some things that worked/didn't  work that might be able to be passed on directly to dd1's teachers  (specific de-escalation techniques, use of empathy as encouragement,  breaking things into tiny chunks, etc). 
This is one of the first times I've really felt the school personnel  were listening to me. Unfortunately, the LSSP we dealt with  last year still oversees the "Autism Team" at the school, so I will  still have to deal with her through all this. Those are the meetings I  will bring the advocate with or pay out of pocket for the child  psychologist to attend with me.
We discussed the possibility of an aide, but they both said they didn't  feel it was LRE to jump right to an aide (least restrictive environment)  but pulled up her current accomodations and verified that she hasn't  been receiving inclusion support, which *is* the next step. A special ed  teacher would come into her classroom for her most difficult  classes/meltdown apt times and be available for 1-on-1 support including  bathroom/hygeine needs and lunch if necessary. I'm cool with that being  the next step, if it doesn't help by next semester I can renew my  request for an aide. 
We also, for the first time, talked about futures planning (in this  case, "what happens next year when she moves to middle school"). The ARD  committee (and myself) will determine where her needs are at the end of  the school year, and THEY will research which of the neighboring middle  schools have the best support, available staffing, or other things  (like "Circle of Friends" social skills groups etc). Then I will have  the option of transferring her out of our zoned school, or even out of  the district if we choose to have her in the best school to meet her  needs. (YES!!!!!!!!!!! CAN I JUST SAY YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!).
.jpg) 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment